JOSEPH NEWMAN'S

STATEMENT TO UNIVERSITIES


The great 19th century innovator of electromagnetism, Michael Faraday, gave personal praise to Professor Thompson of Glasgow as being almost the only one who understood him, when Michael Faraday wrote:

"How few understand the PHYSICAL lines of force! They will not see them, yet all the researches on the subject tend to confirm the views I put forth many years since. Thompson of Glasgow seems almost the only one who acknowledges them. He is perhaps the nearest to understanding what I meant. I am content to wait convinced as I am of the truth of my views."

Michael Faraday recognized that the lines of force of a magnetic field are real, kinetic, physical, and mechanical in nature. This has been ignored in the past 150 years.

Now, ironically and appropriately, history repeats itself in this century.

The following is quoted from Professor Yun Li of E&EE of Glasgow following information sent to him about my work:

"Thank you for sending me such an interesting article (SPECIAL REPORT). I have forwarded the following information to some 100 colleagues. You may get queries from them. If you send further details regarding the motor, I'd be very interested in receiving them."

The following letter was sent to approximately 100 colleagues of Professor Li in response to the article about my work:

"What an interesting article to read! The following mentioned two Glasgow Alumni. One is "Thompson of Glasgow", i.e., William Thompson (Lord Kelvin, 1824-1907, who entered Glasgow University at age of 10). The other is James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879).

"The article described that an electric motor provides an energy as high as the nuclear energy. Do you believe it? You may not believe, probably correctly, that Maxwell's conclusion that electricity, magnetism and light were part of the same phenomenon is true for static (not steady-state) magnetism. Have magnetic mono-poles been found? We know that permanent magnet comes from the aligned gyroscopic self-spin of iron atoms. Owing to the absence of monopoles, the PM can magnetize (almost without losing its own energy) many steel iron pieces (since the flux can always close its loop on its own without the help of further external energy). On contrast, electricity cannot do static charges like this. So I believe in this article, for the energy the motor generates perhaps comes from the coil or PM losing a couple of their spinning atoms.

"The underlying engineering point that this article tries to make is that atoms of a copper wire are aligned by the input voltage and thus the voltage, not the current, should be the driving force of a motor. Thus the motor needs zero current at steady-state. I remember in Wen Soong's PhD thesis, he also mentioned that in an optimal operation the back e.m.f. would be as high as the input voltage at steady-state, which means zero current and power consumption.

Happy reading,

[Signed]

Dr. Yun Li"
Professor, Electrical Engineering, Glasgow

 

A return letter was sent to Professor Li, thanking him for his sincere efforts on behalf of this important technology. Professor Li responded:

"You are welcome. That was at least what I as an academic engineer should and could do, as I believe new inventions should not be dismissed before people understand them.

Thanks again,

Professor Yun Li, Glasgow"

 

FACT:

I now have constructed a prototype of my new energy Motor/Generator such that with a load of a 42-inch fan blade, would cause the voltage within a battery pack consisting of 6-volt dry cell batteries to increase. That has been verified by oscilloscope readings measured properly across the battery pack.

FACT:

All conventional teachings state that the battery voltage should decrease with such a load being placed upon a conventional motor.

In light of the courage and scholarly honesty of Professor Li of Glasgow, I thank Professor Yun Li for his overseas support.

[Signed]

Joseph Westley Newman


Additional Note:

Conventional motors are designed with small coils and operate on HIGH CURRENT, low voltage.

Joseph Newman's Motor/Generators have generally been designed with the optimal purpose of "achieving the LEAST amount of current inputted to have the GREATEST amount of atom alignment in the conductor material (which causes the GREATEST magnetic field)."

It is Joseph Newman's position that because of a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of electromagnetism, all conventional motors have been designed with built-in inefficiencies.



 

"I cannot conceive curved lines of force without the conditions of a PHYSICAL existence in that intermediate space."

--- MICHAEL FARADAY

 

To view these documents, click on the title:

* The Origins of the Patent Battle *
* A New Paradigm *
* An Interesting Demonstration *
* A Cooling Effect *
* Corroborative Information from The Journal of Applied Physics *
* Endorsement of Joseph Newman's Work by Distinguished Expert *
* Affidavits & Evaluation *
* Joseph Newman's Statement to Universities *
* Declaration by Dr. Roger Hastings, PhD *
* Statement by Joseph Newman *
* Four Letters from a Mathematical Physicist *
* Heat & The Three Laws of Thermodynamics *
* Joseph Newman's Theory --- by Dr. Roger Hastings, PhD *
* Letter from Col. Thomas Bearden *
* A Preliminary Quantification of Newman's Effect *
* Design Considerations for Rotating Magnet Newman Motors *
* Measurement and Analysis of Joseph Newman's Energy Generator *
* Commentary Regarding Einstein's Equation of E = mc^2 *
* The Magnetic Current and Single Magnetic Charges *
* Existence of "Less-Than-Whole" Electronic Charges" *
* Light and Quantum Mechanics: Additional Verification *
* Falling Gyroscope Experiment: Additional Verification *

 

To return to the main webpage, click on the title:

The Energy Machine of Joseph Newman

E-mail: josephnewman@earthlink.net